Nursing shift handover: A systematic review

Main Article Content

Y. Charfuelan-Laguna
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1380-5302
D. Hidalgo-Bolaños
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-0742
L. Acosta-Franco
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6900-7073
D. Espejo-Quiroga
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9394-9562
D. Tibaquicha-Bernal
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6162-0823
J. Montaña-Vásquez
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6626-0022
A. Henao-Castaño
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4203-0016

Abstract

Nursing shift handover is an obligatory and a fundamental activity to ensure continuity in the process of patient care.


Objective: To describe the scientific production published between 2007-2017 regarding nursing shift handover within medical emergency services.


Methodology: A systematic review was conducted on six databases. Articles with full texts written in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, and published in indexed journals were included. A critical analysis on each article was conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme spanish, and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology tools. Articles were clustered in a matrix of categories.


Results: From a total of 430 possible articles, 19 were included for this study -17 written in English and 2 written in Spanish. From the corresponding analysis, two categories were structured: Nursing Shift Handover Characteristics, and Process Standardization.


Conclusions: Communication gaps seem to be one of the main issues to address while improving the nursing shift handover process. The patient room should be the place for the shift handover, and this process must be acknowledged by both nursing teams.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
21%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Article Details

Dimensions citation

MÉTRICAS

 

References

1. Green S, Higgins JPT, Alderson P, Clarke M, Mulrow CD, Oxman A. Capítulo 1: Introducción. En: Higgins JPT, Green S (Ed). Manual Cochrane de Revisiones Sistemáticas de Intervenciones, versión 5.1.9. Barcelona: Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano; 2012.

2. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic Reviews, CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Heslington: University of York; 2009. https://bit.ly/2Q0pjBy

3. Cabello JB por CASPe. Plantilla para ayudarte a entender una Revisión Sistemática. En: CASPe. Guías CASPe de Lectura Crítica de la Literatura Médica. Alicante: CASPe; 2005. Cuaderno I. p.13-7. https://bit.ly/2LJx7tb

4. STROBE Statement. STROBE checklists for cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. Berns, Switzerland: University of Bern; 2009. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2LM5hYW

5. Ministry for Health and Social Policy. Clinical Practice Guidelines on Care in Normal Childbirth. Clinical Practice Guidelines in SNHS. Central Publishing Service of the Basque Government; 2010.

6. Guevara-Lozano M, Arroyo-Marles LP. The Handover a Central Concept in Nursing Care. Enfermería glob. 2015; (37): 419-34. https://bit.ly/2VYeCFe

7. Bakon S, Wirihana L, Christensen M, Craft J. Nursing handovers: An integrative review of the different models and processes available. Int J Nurs Pract. 2016; 23(2): 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12520

8. Calleja P, Aitken L, Cooke M. Staff perceptions of best practice for information transfer about multitrauma patients on discharge from the emergency department: a focus group study. J Clin Nurs. 2016; 25(19-20): 2863-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13334

9. Kerr D, McKay K, Klim S, Kelly AM, McCann T. Attitudes of emergency department patients about handover at the bedside. J Clin Nurs. 2014; 23(11-12): 1685-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12308

10. Kerr D, Klim S, Kelly AM, McCann T. Impact of a modified nursing handover model for improving nursing care and documentation in the emergency department: A pre-and post-implementation study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014; 22(1): 89-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12365

11. McMurray A, Chaboyer W, Wallis M, Fetherston C. Implementing bedside handover: strategies for change management. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19(17-18): 2580-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03033.x

12. Farhan M, Brown R, Vincent C, Woloshynowych M. The ABC of handover: impact on shift handover in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2012; 29(12): 947-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2011-200201

13. Ye K, Taylor McD, Knott JC, Dent A, MacBean CE. Handover in the emergency department: deficiencies and adverse effects. Emerg Med Australas. 2007; 19(5): 433-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00984.x

14. Llapa-Rodríguez EO, Da Silva-Oliveira C, Raylane-Santosde Fanca T, Santos-de Andrade J, Pontes-de Aguiar Campos M, Costacurta-Pinto da Silva FJ. Programación del cambio de turno desde la óptica de los profesionales de enfermería. Enfermería glob. 2013; 12(3): 206-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.12.3.157441

15. Cochrane nursing care field (CNCF). What is the best nursing handover style to ensure continuity of information for hospital patients? Int J Nurs Stud. 2016; 58: 97-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.004

16. Spooner AJ, Aitken LM, Corley A, Chaboyer W. Developing a minimum dataset for nursing team leader handover in the intensive care unit: A focus group study. Aust Crit Care. 2017; 31(1): 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2017.01.005

17. Liu W, Manias E, Gerdtz M. Medication communication between nurses and patients during nursing handovers on medical wards: a critical ethnographic study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012; (8): 941-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.008

18. Smeulers M, Dolman CD, Atema D, Dieren SV, Maaskant JM, Vermeulen H. Safe and effective nursing shift handover with NURSEPASS: An interrupted time series. Appl Nurs Res. 2016; 32: 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2016.07.010

19. Machaczek K, Whietfield M, Kilner K, Allmark P. Doctors' and nurses' perceptions of barriers to conducting handover in hospitals in the Czech Republic. AJNR. 2013; 1(1): 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/ajnr-1-1-1

20. Smeulers M, Vermeulen H. Bost of both worlds: combining evidence with local context to develop a nursing shift handover blueprint. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016; 28(6): 749-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw101

21. Wildner J, Ferri P. Patient participation in change of shift procedures: The implementation of the Bedside Handover for the improvement of nursing Quality in an Italian Hospice. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2012; 14(3): 216-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0b013e318243251f

22. Drach-Zahavy A, Shilman O. Patients' participation during a nursing handover: the role of handover characteristics and patients' personal traits. J Adv Nurs. 2014; 71(1): 136-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.12477

23. Yáñez-Corral AM, Zárate-Grajales RA. Diseño de un instrumento para evaluar el proceso de enlace de turno en enfermería. Enferm. Univ. 2016; 13(2): 99-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reu.2016.03.002