Transferência de atenção pré-hospitalar entre equipes de saúde: revisão integrativa

Main Article Content

J. Dalco-Miorin
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7672-7191
S. Camponogara
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-3683
T. Silva-de Mello
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-6163
K.E. Petry
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5622-2580
A. Bonfada-Torquetti
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6898-1090
G. Loise-Dias
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9021-7435

Resumo

Introdução: As transferências de atenção efetivas permitem satisfazer as necessidades de continuidade do atendimento; porém, poucos estudos se centram em comunicar informação a esse respeito.


Objetivo: Analisar a evidência disponível na literatura sobre a transferência do atendimento pré-hospitalar entre equipes de saúde.


Metodologia: Revisão integrativa. A busca de estudos primários realizou-se em quatro bases de dados (PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, Scopus). A amostra consistiu em 20 pesquisas, que se agruparam em duas categorias.


Resultados: A síntese da evidência apontou as estratégias empregadas pelas equipes de saúde para estandardizar a comunicação de informação durante a transferência da atenção pré-hospitalar e as circunstâncias que intervém neste momento. Dentre as estratégias salientamos o uso de um formulário de ambulância para utilizar nos serviços que continuarão o atendimento. Circunstâncias intermediárias incluem demoras na transferência e falhas na informação/comunicação.


Discussão. O uso de mnemônicos e protocolos para uma melhor transferência não é generalizado, mas existe consenso que a falta de processos de comunicação integrados contribui às falhas no atendimento.


Conclusão: As transferências efetivas de atendimento são complexas já que há vários fatores que interferem em seu processo, os quais dependem de negociações e acordos entre as equipes de saúde e os gestores.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2,4

Reviewer profiles  Indisp.

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
Indisp.
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
21%
33%
Days to publication 
414
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Indisp.
Publisher 
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Article Details

Dimensions citation

MÉTRICAS

 

Referências

1. Streeter AR, Harrington NG. Nurse handoff communication. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2017; 33(5): 536-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2017.10.002

2. Brito-de Souza R, Paes-da Silva MJ, Nori A. Pronto-socorro: uma visão sobre a interação entre profissionais de enfermagem e pacientes. Rev. Gaúcha Enferm. 2007; 28(2): 242-9. https://bit.ly/3apjNUY

3. Yong G, Dent AW, Weiland TJ. Handover from paramedics: Observations and emergency department clinician perceptions. Emerg Med Australas. 2008; 20(2): 149-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01035.x

4. AlBashtawy M, Aljezawi M. Emergency nurses’ perspective of workplace violence in Jordanian hospitals: A national survey. Int Emerg Nurs. 2016; 24: 61-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2015.06.005

5. Siemsen IMD, Madsen MD, Pedersen LF, Michaelsen L, Pedersen AV, Andersen HB, et al. Factors that impact on the safety of patient handovers: An interview study. Scand J Public Health. 2012; 40(5): 439-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812453889

6. Joint Commission International. Padrões de Acreditação da Joint Commission International para Hospitais. 5ta ed. EUA: JCI; 2014.

7. Campbell B, Stirling C, Cummings E. Continuity matters: Examining the ‘information gap’ in transfer from Residential Aged Care, ambulance to emergency triage in southern Tasmania. Int Emerg Nurs. 2017; 32: 09-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2016.05.001

8. Jamshidi H, Jazani RK, Alibabaei A, Alamdari S, Kalyani MN. Challenges of Cooperation between the Pre-hospital and In-hospital Emergency services in the handover of victims of road traffic accidents: A Qualitative Study. Invest Educ Enferm. 2019; 37(1): 70-9. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v37n1e08

9. Panchal AR, Gaither JB, Svirsky I, Prosser B, Stolz U, Spaite DW. The impact of professionalism on transfer of care to the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2015; 49(1): 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.062

10. Smeulers M, Lucas C, Vermeulen H. Effectiveness of different nursing handover styles for ensuring continuity of information in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (6): CD009979. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009979.pub2

11. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: Updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 52(5): 546-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

12. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). CASP Checklists. Oxford: 2014. https://bit.ly/3qw2W8w

13. Fineout-Overholt E, Stillwell SB. Asking compelling, clinical questions. En: Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare. A guide to best practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

14. Silva-Ursi E, Galvão CM. Prevenção de lesões de pele no perioperatório: revisão integrativa da literatura. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2006; 14(1): 124-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692006000100017

15. Jenkin A, Abelson-Mitchell N, Cooper S. Patient handover: Time for a change? Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007; 15(3): 141-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaen.2007.04.004

16. Evans SM, Murray A, Patrick I, Fitzgerald M, Smith S, Cameron P. Clinical handover in the trauma setting: A qualitative study of paramedics and trauma team members. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19(6): e57. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.039073

17. Evans SM, Murray A, Patrick I, Fitzgerald M, Smith S, Andrianopoulos N, et al. Assessing clinical handover between paramedics and the trauma team. Injury 2010; 41(5): 460-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.07.065

18. Iedema R, Ball C, Daly B, Young J, Green T, Middleton PM, et al. Design and trial of a new ambulance-to-emergency department handover protocol: ‘IMIST-AMBO’. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21(8): 627-33. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000766

19. Zhang Z, Sarcevic A, Burd RS. Supporting information use and retention of pre-hospital information during trauma resuscitation: A qualitative study of pre-hospital communications and information needs. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013: 1579-88. https://bit.ly/37nMos1

20. Waldron R, Sixsmith DM. Emergency physician awareness of prehospital procedures and medications. West J Emerg Med. 2014; 15(4): 504-10. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.2.18651

21. Ebben RH, van Grunsven PM, Moors ML, Aldenhoven P, de Vaan J, van Hout R, et al. A tailored e-learning program to improve handover in the chain of emergency care: A pre-test post-test study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015; 23(33); 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0113-3

22. Budd HR, Almond LM, Porter K. A survey of trauma alert criteria and handover practice in England and Wales. Emerg Med J. 2007; 24(4): 302-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2006.038323

23. Fitzpatrick D, Maxwell D, Craigie A. The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary testing of a novel, low-tech intervention to improve pre-hospital data recording for pre-alert and handover to the Emergency Department. BCM Emerg Med. 2018; 18(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-018-0168-3

24. Bruce K, Suserud BO. The handover process and triage of ambulance-borne patients: the experiences of emergency nurses. Nurs Crit Care. 2005; 10(4): 201-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1362-1017.2005.00124.x

25. Cone DC, Middleton PM, Marashi-Pour S. Analysis and impact of delays in ambulance to emergency department handovers. Emerg Med Australas. 2012; 24(5): 525-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2012.01589.x

26. Bost N, Crilly J, Patterson E, Chaboyer W. Clinical handover of patients arriving by ambulance to a hospital emergency department: A qualitative study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2012; 20(3): 133-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2011.10.002

27. Catchpole KR, Gangi A, Blocker RC, Ley EJ, Blaha J, Gewertz BL, et al. Flow disruptions in trauma care handoffs. J Surg Res. 2013; 184: 586-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.038

28. Clarey A, Allen M, Bruce-McDonnell S, Cooke MW. Ambulance handovers: Can a dedicated ED nurse solve the delay in ambulance turnaround times? Emerg Med J. 2014; 31(5): 419-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-202258

29. O'Hara R, Johnson M, Siriwardena AN, Weyman A, Turner J, Shaw D, et al. A qualitative study of systemic influences on paramedic decision making: Care transitions and patient safety. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015; 20(1 Suppl) :45-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819614558472

30. Hovenkamp GT, Olgers TJ, Wortel RR, Noltes ME, Dercksen B, Ter Maaten JC . The satisfaction regarding handovers between ambulance and emergency department nurses: an observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018; 26(1): 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0545-7

31. Lawrence RH, Tomolo AM, Garlisi AP, Aron DC. Conceptualizing handover strategies at change of shift in the emergency department: A grounded theory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-256

32. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Assistência segura: uma reflexão teórica aplicada à prática. Brasília: ANVISA; 2017. https://n9.cl/r30v

33. Marques-Acosta A. Transição do cuidado de pacientes com doenças crônicas: do serviço de emergência para o domicílio [Tese]. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2016.

34. Pereira-da Silva MV, Gomes-de Carvalho PM. Cultura de segurança do paciente: atitudes dos profissionais de enfermagem de um serviço de pronto-atendimento. Rev. Interdiscip. 2016; 9(1): 1-12. https://bit.ly/3u9uanG