Phenomenological study: I am a father and I observed the labor process. It was a dream come true!
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The implementation processes in the accompaniment of women in birth labor in Colombian institutions are deficient and without solid support in nursing theories, however, as the world progresses, new fathers seek to be involved in the birth of their child.
Objective: To understand the experience of fathers who experienced the birth of their child in a health institution in Bogotá (Colombia) between July 2018 and March 2019.
Method: An interpretive phenomenological qualitative study that integrated the nursing theory of Human Development proposed by Rosemarie Rizzo Parse. The information was collected through interviews with 8 fathers with non-participant and participant observation, field diaries and phone calls.
Results: The father's experience was consolidated in 3 themes: the birth of the fathers, the three of us are there and nursing excellent support.
Discussion: The study allows us to penetrate into a nurtured structure of a father's feelings, sensations, attitudes, and values, essential to living the experience as described.
Conclusion: The parents who had the process of human development began with the structuring of the meaning it was as important as my own life, then they went through the configuration of their rhythmic guidelines that refers to they chose to be present and, finally, they co-transcended towards the desired parenthood. The results serve as a guide for nursing care of the parents who experience the birth of their children, based on a real presence. They also show the importance of strengthening nursing policies, plans, and guidelines.
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Article Details
Dimensions citation
MÉTRICAS
References
2. Villarraga de Ramírez L. Atención del profesional de la salud al vínculo psico-afectivo madre-padre-hijo. av. enferm.1994; 12(2-3): 26-30. https://bit.ly/3cs4wne
3. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Recomendaciones de la OMS sobre el nacimiento. Declaración de Fortaleza,1985. Tecnología apropiada para el parto. Lancet. 1985; 2: 436-7. https://bit.ly/31nOYuE
4. Gouvêa-de Matos M, Seixas-Magalhães A, Féres-Carneiro T, Nonato-Machado R. Construindo o vínculo pai-bebê: a experiência dos pais. Psico-USF. 2017; 22(2): 261-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712017220206
5. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Recomendaciones de la OMS sobre intervenciones de promoción de salud para la salud materna y neonatal. Ginebra: OMS; 2015. https://bit.ly/39izyw8
6. Jiménez-Hernández GE, Peña-Jaramillo YM. Adherencia a las recomendaciones de la OMS en la atención del parto y nacimiento humanizado. Medellín, Colombia. Rev Univ Ind Santander Salud. 2018; 50(4): 320–7. https://doi.org/10.18273/revsal.v50n4-2018005
7. Tarouco-da Silva B, Santos-da Silva MR, Nunes-Bueno ME. Significant intra and extra-family events in the fatherhood construction process. Esc. Anna Nery. 2014; 18(4): 710-5. https://doi.org/10.5935/1414-8145.20140101
8. Fawcett J. Criteria for evaluation of theory. Nurs Sci Q. 2005; 18(2): 131-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/089431840527482
9. Rizzo-Parse R. Manuscripts: what's missing? Nurs Sci Q. 2020; 33(2): 109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318419898173
10. Robinson-Lane SG. Interdisciplinary nursing faculty and advancement of nursing knowledge. Nurs Outlook. 2021; S0029-6554(21)00027-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2021.02.003
11. Mitchel GJ, Bournes DA. Rosemarie Pizzo Parse. Desarrollo Humano. En: Raile-Alligood M, Marriner-Tomey A. Modelos y teorías en enfermería. 7a ed. Barcelona: Elsevier. 2011.
12. Guerrero-Castañeda RF, de Oliva-Menezes TM, Lenise-do Prado M. La fenomenología en investigación de enfermería: reflexión en la hermenéutica de Heidegger. Esc. Anna Nery. 2019; 23(4): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2019-0059
13. Shosha GA. Employment of Colaizzi’s strategy in descriptive phenomenology: a reflection of a researcher. Eur Sci J. 2012; 8(27): 31-43. https://bit.ly/3Dr9E6G
14. Cypress BS. Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017; 36(4): 253-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253
15. Noreña-Peña A, Alcaraz-Moreno N, Rojas JG, Rebolledo-Malpica DM. Aplicabilidad de los criterios de rigor y éticos en la investigación cualitativa. 2012; 12(3): 263-74. https://bit.ly/3w38Lh3
16. Consejo de Organizaciones Internacionales de las Ciencias Médicas (CIOMS)/Organización Mundial de la Salud. Pautas éticas internacionales para la investigación biomédica en seres humanos. Ginebra: CIOMS/OMS; 2002. https://bit.ly/3ssitay
17. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Registro Único de Afiliados–RUAF. Aplicación Nacimientos y Defunciones. Bogotá, Colombia: MinSalud; actualización 2021. https://bit.ly/2P43chQ
18. Philpott LF, Leahy-Warren P, FitzGerald S, Savage E. Stress in fathers in the perinatal period: a systematic review. Midwifery. 2017; 55: 113-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.016
19. Etheridge J, Slade P. “Nothing’s actually happened to me.”: the experiences of fathers who found childbirth traumatic. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1): 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1259-y
20. Howarth AM, Scott KM, Swain NR. First-time fathers’ perception of their childbirth experiences. J Health Psychol. 2019; 24(7): 929-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316687628
21. Poh HL, Koh SSL, He HG. An integrative review of fathers’ experiences during pregnancy and childbirth. Int Nurs Rev. 2014; 61(4): 543-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12137
22. Werner-Bierwisch T, Pinkert C, Niessen K, Metzing S, Hellmers C. Mothers’ and fathers’ sense of security in the context of pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period: an integrative literature review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1): 473. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2096-3
23. Muñoz-Serrano M, Uribe-Torres C, Hoga L. Padre preparado y comprometido en su rol de acompañante durante el proceso de parto. Aquichan. 2018; 18(4): 415-25. https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2018.18.4.4
24. Johansson M, Fenwick J, Premberg A. A meta-synthesis of fathers׳ experiences of their partner׳s labour and the birth of their baby. Midwifery. 2015; 31(1): 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.05.005
25. Xue WL, He HG, Chua YJ, Wang W, Shorey S. Factors influencing first-time fathers’ involvement in their wives’ pregnancy and childbirth: a correlational study. Midwifery. 2018; 62: 20-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.002
26. Castiblanco-López N, Muñoz-de Rodríguez L. Visión de las madres en el cuidado del hijo prematuro en el hogar. av. enferm. 2011; 29(1): 120-9. https://bit.ly/31lZFO6
27. Shorey S, Ang L, Goh ECL, Gandhi M. Factors influencing paternal involvement during infancy: a prospective longitudinal study. J Adv Nurs. 2019; 75(2): 357-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13848
28. Xue WL, Shorey S, Wang W, He HG. Fathers’ involvement during pregnancy and childbirth: an integrative literature review. Midwifery. 2018; 62: 135-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.013

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Enfermería Universitaria by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México it is distributed under the License Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Accepted and published articles become open-access under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which authorizes the reproduction and sharing without commercial purposes, provided the corresponding acknowledgments to their authors. Authors are allowed to manage a self-archive copy of the article’s published version so that they can open-access it in their personal or institutional web pages, and/or any other broad-diffusion space.